Global regulation via modulation of ribosome pausing by the ABC-F protein EttA

Having multiple rounds of translation of the same mRNA creates dynamic complexities along with opportunities for regulation related to ribosome pausing and stalling at specific sequences. Yet, mechanisms controlling these critical processes and the principles guiding their evolution remain poorly understood. Through genetic, genomic, physiological, and biochemical approaches, we demonstrate that regulating ribosome pausing at specific amino acid sequences can produce ~2-fold changes in protein expression levels which strongly influence cell growth and therefore evolutionary fitness. We demonstrate, both in vivo and in vitro, that the ABC-F protein EttA directly controls the translation of mRNAs coding for a subset of enzymes in the tricarboxylic acid (TCA) cycle and its glyoxylate shunt, which modulates growth in some chemical environments. EttA also modulates expression of specific proteins involved in metabolically related physiological and stress-response pathways. These regulatory activities are mediated by EttA rescuing ribosomes paused at specific patterns of negatively charged residues within the first 30 amino acids of nascent proteins. We thus establish a unique global regulatory paradigm based on sequence-specific modulation of translational pausing.


Reporting Summary
Nature Portfolio wishes to to improve the reproducibility of of the work that we we publish.This form provides structure for consistency and transparency in in reporting.For further information on on Nature Portfolio policies, see our Editorial Policies and the Editorial Policy Checklist Statistics For all statistical analyses, confirm that the following items are present in in the figure legend, table legend, main text, or or Methods section.

n/a Confirmed
The exact sample size (n) for each experimental group/condition, given as as a discrete number and unit of of measurement A statement on on whether measurements were taken from distinct samples or or whether the same sample was measured repeatedly The statistical test(s) used AND whether they are one-or or two-sided Only common tests should be described solely by name; describe more complex techniques in the Methods section.

A description of of all covariates tested
A description of of any assumptions or or corrections, such as as tests of of normality and adjustment for multiple comparisons A full description of of the statistical parameters including central tendency (e.g.means) or or other basic estimates (e.g.regression coefficient) AND variation (e.g. standard deviation) or or associated estimates of of uncertainty (e.g.confidence intervals) For null hypothesis testing, the test statistic (e.g.F, t, r) with confidence intervals, effect sizes, degrees of of freedom and P value noted Give P values as exact values whenever suitable.
For Bayesian analysis, information on on the choice of of priors and Markov chain Monte Carlo settings For hierarchical and complex designs, identification of of the appropriate level for tests and full reporting of of outcomes Estimates of of effect sizes (e.g.Cohen's d, Pearson's r), ), indicating how they were calculated Our web collection on statistics for biologists contains articles on many of the points above.

Software and code
Policy information about availability of of computer code

Data collection Data analysis
For manuscripts utilizing custom algorithms or or software that are central to to the research but not yet described in published literature, software must be be made available to to editors and reviewers.We We strongly encourage code deposition in in a community repository (e.g.GitHub).See the Nature Portfolio guidelines for submitting code & software for further information.

Reporting on sex and gender
Reporting on race, ethnicity, or other socially relevant groupings

Ethics oversight
Note that full information on the approval of the study protocol must also be provided in the manuscript.

Field-specific reporting
Please select the one below that is the best fit for your research.If you are not sure, read the appropriate sections before making your selection.

Life sciences
Behavioural & social sciences Ecological, evolutionary & environmental sciences For a reference copy of the document with all sections, see nature.com/documents/nr-reporting-summary-flat.pdf

Life sciences study design
All studies must disclose on these points even when the disclosure is negative.Identify the organization(s) that approved the study protocol.
All the presented experiments were carried out in triplicate as a standard in the field.Statistical analyses showed significant differences between tested conditions, confirming that the sample sizes were sufficient Principal component analysis of the S15 proteomic result showed an outlier sample for one of the "ettA biological triplicate, therefore, it was excluded and the analysis was carried on biological duplicate for the three strains.
All experiments were replicated.All attempts at replication were successful.
Randomization was not relevant for this study, since the outcomes of the experiments are not dependent of the judgment of the researcher but depend of control reactions.
Blinding was not relevant for this study, since the outcomes of the experiments are not dependent of the judgment of the researcher but depend of control reactions.We We carried out Western blot on on a protein lysates from strains that express or or not the YFP protein .
A specific band at at the right size was visualized only with the YFP expression (Extended Data Fig. 2b).
Describe the methods by which all novel plant genotypes were produced.This includes those generated by transgenic approaches, gene editing, chemical/radiation-based mutagenesis and hybridization.For transgenic lines, describe the transformation method, the number of independent lines analyzed and the generation upon which experiments were performed.For gene-edited lines, describe the editor used, the endogenous sequence targeted for editing, the targeting guide RNA sequence (if applicable) and how the editor was applied.was applied.was applied.
Report on the source of all seed stocks or other plant material used.If applicable, state the seed stock centre and catalogue number.If plant specimens were collected from the field, describe the collection location, date and sampling procedures.
Describe any authentication procedures for each seed stock used or novel genotype generated.Describe any experiments used to Describe any authentication procedures for each seed stock used or novel genotype generated.Describe any experiments used to Describe any authentication procedures for each seed stock used or novel genotype generated.Describe any experiments used to assess the effect of a mutation and, where applicable, how potential secondary effects (e.g.second site T-DNA insertions, mosiacism, off-target gene editing) were examined.
antibody : Thermo Fisher, Invitrogen GFP Antibody (A-11122) Secondary Antibody anti rabbit IRdye 800CW : Li-cor (926-32213) Secondary Antibody anti rabbit HRP : Promega, Anti-Rabbit IgG HRP Conjugate (W401B) -13458.Proteomic are available through the massIVE Repository (https://massive.ucsd.edu/ProteoSAFe/static/massive.jsp)underaccessioncode:MSV000093143.Use the terms sex (biological attribute) and gender (shaped by social and cultural circumstances) carefully in order to avoid confusing both terms.Indicate if findings apply to only one sex or gender; describe whether sex and gender were considered in study design; whether sex and/or gender was determined based on self-reporting or assigned and methods used.Provide in the source data disaggregated sex and gender data, where this information has been collected, and if consent has been obtained for sharing of individual-level data; provide overall numbers in this Reporting Summary.Please state if this information has not been collected.Report sex-and gender-based analyses where performed, justify reasons for lack of sex-and gender-based analysis.Please specify the socially constructed or socially relevant categorization variable(s) used in your manuscript and explain why they were used.Please note that such variables should not be used as proxies for other socially constructed/relevant variables (for example, race or ethnicity should not be used as a proxy for socioeconomic status).Provide clear definitions of the relevant terms used, how they were provided (by the participants/respondents, the researchers, or third parties), and the method(s) used to classify people into the different categories (e.g.self-report, census or administrative data, social media data, etc.) Please provide details about how you controlled for confounding variables in your analyses.Describe the covariate-relevant population characteristics of the human research participants (e.g.age, genotypic information, past and current diagnosis and treatment categories).If you filled out the behavioural & social sciences study design questions and have nothing to add here, write "See above."Describe how participants were recruited.Outline any potential self-selection bias or other biases that may be present and how these are likely to impact results.
We require information from authors about some types of materials, experimental systems and methods used in many studies.Here, indicate whether each material, system or method listed is relevant to your study.If you are not sure if a list item applies to your research, read the appropriate section before selecting a response.MTAB